> --The following statement is from the mind:
> 
There is *Mind* only - everything else is an illusion.
This is the cardinal doctrine of Adwaita Vedanta. What
you have posted is a POV - all POVs are false: there
is no "mind".

So, why, exactly, would Wayne Liquorman's understanding 
of Adwaita would be a joke to most of America?

> Actually, the statement "There is One only" is *Mind*;
> it's not a point-of-view, it's the *Mind Only*
> experienced in transcendental consciousness - there is
> no origin - all POV are false. That's the point."
> 
> > > The statement "There is One only" is from the 
> > > POV of mind.
> > > 
Richard J. Williams wrote:
> > Actually, the statement "There is One only" is *Mind*; 
> > it's not a point-of-view, it's the *Mind Only* 
> > experienced in transcendental consciousness - there is 
> > no origin - all POV are false. That's the point. 
> > 
> > Another way of stating this truth is that "there are 
> > not two". Both of these statements come from the 
> > Adwaita Vedanta scriptures, which according to Shankara, 
> > are valid means of knowledge.
> > 
> > But even so, I'm not understanding why Wayne Liquorman's
> > understanding of Adwaita would be a joke to most of 
> > America.
> > 
> > Duveyoung wrote:
> > > > > One could do much worse for an Advaitic guru
> > > > > than Tolle so I'm not complaining -- imagine, 
> > > > > shudder, if Oprah had imprinted on, say, Wayne 
> > > > > Liquorman, why Advaita would be a joke to
> > > > > most of America.  
> > > > >
> > Richard J. Williams wrote:
> > > > Well, maybe so, but what exact aspect of Wayne 
> > > > Liquorman's writing on Adwaita are you protesting? 
> > > > Is it a major issue or a minor issue?
> > > > 
> > > > There are three issues that must be understood in 
> > > > order to understand Adwaita: The realization that 
> > > > there are *not two*, the realization that things 
> > > > and events are an *illusion*, and the *dispelling 
> > > > of illusion* by process of experiential pure 
> > > > conciousness.
> > > > 
> > > > In a nutshell: 
> > > > 
> > > > There is One only. There is no creation; no 
> > > > destruction; no coming to be, and no ceasing to 
> > > > be. Things do not change, neither do they move 
> > > > about or stay the same. Things and events are an 
> > > > illusion, not real, yet not unreal. The 
> > > > Transcendental Conciousness is the only Reality. 
> > > > Liberation is the way to avoid the results of 
> > > > actions and to be free.
> > > > 
> > > > The metaphor of a burning firebrand that is 
> > > > waved in a circle, which creates an illusion of 
> > > > a continuous circle of fire has been used to 
> > > > describe the non-dual realization, which when 
> > > > experienced in reality, becomes just a series 
> > > > of point-instants of perception.
> > > > 
> > > > Titles of interest:
> > > > 
> > > > 'Consciousness Speaks'
> > > > Conversations with Ramesh S. Balsekar
> > > > by Ramesh S. Balsekar and Wayne Liquorman
> > > > Advaita Press, 1992
> > > > 
> > > > 'The Book of One'
> > > > The Spiritual Path of Advaita
> > > > by Dennis Waite
> > > > O Books, 2004
> > > > 
> > > > 'Dispelling Illusion'
> > > > Gaudapada's Alatasanti
> > > > Douglas A. Fox
> > > > State University of New York Press, 1993
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to