--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> forwarded: > > "We're going to talk about parallel reality."
Cool. I'm checking in from Sitges, Spain, about as parallel a reality as I've ever experienced. > "When I've talked to you > in the past about dimensions... Don't know who is speaking, but this is a shaky start IMO. "Talking to" is not the same thing as "talking with." > "...we've... We? I thought that he was the one doing the talking. > "...said here's one dimension and > here's another dimension, and they're living side by side with one > another. But there's also a fabric of consciousness that bleeds back > and forth from one dimension to the other. They're not just standing > there like soldiers unrelated to each other. There's a gate or > fabric of consciousness that's flowing into one, flowing back to > the other, flowing here and there. In case no one else noticed it, I should point out that the two possibilities that whoever this is mentions are not self- contradictory. They could -- and in my opinion, do -- coexist peacefully. The "separate realities" really DO stand there like soldiers unrelated to each other, because they *aren't* related to each other. Yes, there are gates or, as I prefer, portals that lead from one reality to another, but that doesn't necessarily make the realities related one-to-one with each other. Relational Database 101, dude. > On a practical level, the point at which something splits off, a > choice point at which one dimension goes this way and one dimension > goes that way, where we are in the world right now we're coming to > a major choice point. Duh. Every second. > with possibility going this way and one possibility going that way > and one possibility going another way, you really get the feeling of > how you can have a fountainhead and things can sprout out of that > and each possible parallel reality has an interrelationship with > the other ones and they're in a flow together. No problem with flow. Problem with you or any other human claiming that they know where that flow is going. I am of the opinion that that's a little too presumptuous in the face of an incalculable universe. > When you have choice points that are very close like this, there's > such a small gap between these three people, essentially what's > happening is that the dimensions are closing in on one another. > They're collapsing. Whereas before perhaps our experience was that > the dimensions were very discrete, so you had a big gap. Now the gap > is closing and it's a very small gap. That's why there's a feeling > that the depth of difference between these three possibilities > actually isn't that big. Actually, I can't argue with any of this para- graph. Been there, done that. But the fact that one *perceives* the realities as not that different doesn't make them not that different. It's the perception that has shifted IMO, not the realities and their relationship or non-relationship with each other. > A dimension is kind of like a membrane. That's why when we work with > the chakras, they're such a good example of what a dimension feels > like because you can feel these subtle membranes in the chakras > moving back and forth. A dimension is like that. It has a certain > edge to it, a circumference, and that circumference is very fine. > You can move from one edge of that circumference to the next edge > and a whole other possible reality opens up. Not impressed. Even Carlos did better than this. > Normally, we are protected from experiencing a parallel reality in > any clear way because we're locked into a framework of our > dimension. We can only experience what is right here. We don't > have the capacity to see outside that bubble. We're kind of locked > away in that bubble. There are a lot of good reasons for that. For > one thing, it keeps you focused. It keeps you connected to what's > going on so you don't bleed out into some other possibility. But > as time and consciousness are moving in the way that they are right > now, the possibility of perceiving parallel connectivity is much > more pronounced, so you can have the capacity to move out into this > other level of awareness and still maintain your own." Carlos did *much* better than this. This is basic first attention, second attention stuff. Did this person *take* this anywhere, or just rap? Curious in Sitges
