--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > Could it be that people who have spent decades *not* > > > > using their critical faculties, and reacting to > > > > ANYTHING said by the people they have deemed "author- > > > > ities" as Truth Incarnate, seem to feel after a few > > > > years or decades doing this that that is how other > > > > people should react to THEM? > > > > > > No. > > > > And is that answer authoritative? > > Is it "truth?" :-) > > It's factually correct, yes. > > <snip> > > I'm not surprised you chimed in, Judy. > > Of course you're not, Barry. You wouldn't be so > Important if you were surprised. > > Just as an > > unrelated question, is anyone's view of Hillary Clinton > > correct if it doesn't agree with yours? > > Possibly, depending on the specifics. "View of" > is rather broad.
7 posts before 4:00 a.m. your time Saturday night, Jude. Could this be part of your plan to "post out" long before Hillary gets trounced in the primaries during the next few days and has to concede, so that you won't have to be here to explain it away? :-) Just asking. Unlike you, I don't claim to know that my answer to a question about *opinion* is true or "factually correct." I rest my case.
