--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Just asking. Unlike you, I don't claim to know > > that my answer to a question about *opinion* > > is true or "factually correct." > > And a good thing too, since your "opinion" is based > on nonfacts.
Funny you should mention that. I was going to ask you about these "facts" you're referring to. Here's a short refresher course in the thread I'm referring to: > > > > Could it be that people who have spent decades *not* > > > > using their critical faculties, and reacting to > > > > ANYTHING said by the people they have deemed "author- > > > > ities" as Truth Incarnate, seem to feel after a few > > > > years or decades doing this that that is how other > > > > people should react to THEM? > > > > > > No. > > > > And is that answer authoritative? > > Is it "truth?" :-) > > It's factually correct, yes. Can you point out to me the "facts" that you are speaking about? The original question is a speculation based upon observation, and opinion formed as a result of that observation, asking for an opinion in return. Your answer of "No" to the question that begins "Could it be that..." sounds pretty definite to me, almost, uh, authoritative. As I read it, that one-word answer says, "No, it could *not* be that..." Are you qualified to say that? Do you *know* that my speculation is not true for many TMers? (I know that you have a tendency to believe that anything *anyone* writes is about you, but the original post wasn't.) So I'm hoping you can expand upon your answer somewhat and tell us what about your answer of "No" was "factually correct." What were the "facts" that you perceive as "correct" in a matter of opinion? Or could it be that you replied to my rap about how some long-term TMers tend to post here as if they know the "Truth" by replying as if you know the "Truth?"
