--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, m2smart4u2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Behalf Of m2smart4u2000 > > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 8:02 PM > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Promises and Ethics > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "Rick Archer" <rick@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Which ones have I broken? > > > > Confidentiality of the techniques. You are the moderator of this > > website so you can delete things that break that promise. > > I am sure you promised not to reveal the techniques and that you > > accepted that you were not guaranteed that you would be satisfied > > with the results of them. > > > > Even if you divorce yourself from someone,you don't go speak all > > their secrets. > > > > I have seen, in the past that you are careful to not reveal names > of > > people who you have suggested had inappropriate relations, and yet > > you allow the techniques that you promised to protect to be > discussed > > in full. > > > > Your point is not without merit. I do feel a bit squeamish when > people start > > revealing mantras and techniques. I have occasionally deleted posts > when > > something was said that left a permanent record on the net > embarrassing > > someone. For instance, there was a fellow in town who had some > mental > > problems and there were some posts about him here which his mother > didn't > > want him to find. So she asked me to delete them and I did. I also > have to > > contact the webmaster of a mirror site and have him delete stuff, > which is > > an imposition. But if I agreed to delete everything which the TMO > didn't > > want posted, it would be a full-time job. That info about the > mantras and > > techniques is posted elsewhere on the web, in numerous places, so > having it > > on FFL is merely redundant. I want to maintain freedom of speech > here, and > > that means that very few things are going to qualify for censorship. > > I understand your desire for freedom of speech but the limit comes > with your responsibility to the promises you made and the intention > of this website. Alot of the stuff I don't really care about, people > vent,have different opinions about ayurveda, chopra, stapatya veda > etc. If those opinions bothered me, I wouldn't read the messages > here.Allowing posting of the details of techniques makes you > squeamish for a reason. Listen to your gut reaction and keep the > promises you agreed to. I realize that that imformation is available > on certain other sights, however the point of those sites is > extremely anti TM. They want to completely destroy the movement and > the revelations are intentionally to hurt. That is not the object of > this website.
Authoritarian fundamentalism rears its ugly head.
