--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > This message might invite more scrutiny by the CIA of TMO's > > > intentions aside from spreading vedic knowledge. > > > > > > > > It mighta also invite the scrutiny of the IRS. > > > > Aren't some churches getting their tax-exempt status reviewed because > > they've been playing politics as of late? > > > > TMO isn't a registered church.
Of course it isn't. But it does have tax-exempt status...and my invoking churches wasn't because they were churches per se but because churches also have tax- exempt status. Lobbying groups are not tax exempt. > > I'm probably more than done, message-count-wise. > > Later all. ENjoy your arguing. > > > Lawson >