--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> 
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote:
> > >
> > > This message might invite more scrutiny by the CIA of TMO's 
> > > intentions aside from spreading vedic knowledge.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > It mighta also invite the scrutiny of the IRS.
> > 
> > Aren't some churches getting their tax-exempt status reviewed 
because 
> > they've been playing politics as of late?
> > 
> 
> TMO isn't a registered church.



Of course it isn't.

But it does have tax-exempt status...and my invoking churches wasn't 
because they were churches per se but because churches also have tax-
exempt status.

Lobbying groups are not tax exempt.



> 
> I'm probably more than done, message-count-wise.
> 
> Later all. ENjoy your arguing.
> 
> 
> Lawson
>


Reply via email to