--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "geezerfreak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > Turq, you know the irony about this entire conversation? If > you recall, it all started because one of the brightest new > lights in this group "ruthsimplicity" left and made no bones > about the fact that she left because she had better things > to do than waste another moment of her energy on one Judith > Stein.
Exactly. And Judy's response was to trot out the Lawson Response when confronted with something that the TMO does, "But...but...but...these *other* guys do it, TOO. It was an "I'm not guilty because this person over here is MORE guilty" diversion ploy. > I truly loved Ruth's posts here. Always respectful and often > brilliant. That does NOT mean I always agreed with her! But > she made me think through my position on more than one > occaisian. She also had a patient way (as does Curtis) that > I really do admire. As do I. > But look where we are now.....you-know-who has steered this > whole issue from the loss (100% due to old horse laugh herself) > of someone whose writing REALLY uplifted the entire group down > to a silly conversation about your role in making some > semi-colorless sap leave. Good phrase. I must remember that one. :-) I agree with you. Meanwhile, Judy expended 33 of her 50 posts yesterday, and we only have to live with 17 more of them this week, so it's not all a loss. :-)
