--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: <snip> > > It strains credulity to think circle makers would have > > "planted" this kind of anomalous, virtually invisible > > evidence throughout circles that would have been > > difficult enough to create overnight without it. > > It reminds me of the Noahs Ark someone found on top > of mount Ararat in Turkey. They were convinced it > was the real thing as it was boat shaped and magnetic > imaging revealed it had metal nails set at regular > intervals all over it just like a boat would have. > > When someone independent got permission to examine > it they turned to be natural. It was case of someone > with an interest in it being what they wanted it to be > misinterpeting the evidence to suit their theory. > Just as the two circle experts did in the documentary > I mentioned.
Yeah, that's not at all parallel to the test I quoted from Wikipedia.
