--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's probably best to stick with the "standards,"
> the things that have worked in the past.
> 
> Residence courses, for example. Get your friend
> to a weekend or week-long residence course, where
> he will be told that he cannot leave the facility
> during the course or Bad Things might happen to
> him, and during which every moment of his life is
> carefully planned for him. The discipline of being
> subject to being thrown off the course at any 
> moment for missing a meeting -- in which you are
> to sit quietly staring raptly into a TV monitor
> while indoctrination tapes are played -- will add
> an element of regimentation and by-rote training
> to his TM practice. Also, the discussions of these
> tapes will add to his understanding of how to 
> approach the ideas that support the practice --
> you are to listen quietly and appreciatively to
> the explanations given to you by Those Who Know
> More Than You Do, and never question anything that
> is said. The stern looks given to anyone who does
> not will reinforce the "proper attitude," and the
> regimentation of the course itself, with its care-
> fully-calculated atmosphere of fear of being thrown 
> off the course at any moment for some unidentified
> infraction, will cultivate the proper motivation
> to continue the TM practice.

The above language is intentionally provocative,
to present a different View of TM residence courses
than most TMers have ever entertained. I present it
only *as* a different View, not the "definitive" View.

Imagine what our two resident feminazis would say if
they heard that Obama's campaign had weekend retreats
to train volunteers for the campaingn, and that on
that retreat 1) every minute of their time was mapped
out, and any divergence from the schedule could be
punished by being kicked off the retreat, 2) that no
one was allowed to leave the retreat to go into town
or take a walk by themselves, without a "buddy," and
3) that the lion's share of the retreat was spent
sitting in front of TVs watching hours and hours of
videotapes from Obama spelling out the principles of
his philosphy. You KNOW how they would react. We
would be hearing cries of "Indoctrination!" and slurs
like "Obamazoid Training." 

But when I present a different View of TM residence
courses, I'll also bet that at least one of these
feminazis is going to come roaring in saying how
inconscionable it is to compare them to any kind of
"indoctrination." Right?

I'm NOT saying that this is the *only* View. I'm just
suggesting that it's a View that a thinking person
should entertain from time to time to figure out why
they believe so strongly in the TM dogma.

I had me some *great* times on TM residence courses,
especially the early ones, before they got completely
regimented. And I'm very, very thankful for having had
the opportunity to have long, extended meditations; few
on this planet have such an opportunity.

But I am also coming from a place of having been the
person in the TM Western Regional Office who *ran*
residence courses for the movement for several years.
I set up thousands of such residence courses, and
taught hundreds of them myself. I know *exactly* what
the Rules were for how such a residence course should
be conducted, and what things the participants should
be allowed to do and not do. I should; I typed up these
Rules, exactly as they had been dictated by International
Staff, and distributed them to the course leaders. When
I taught a residence course, I followed those Rules 
myself, to the letter.

And, looked at without discrimination, they were horrible.
At worst, they were based on the idea that TMers should
and must be treated like CHILDREN. They cannot be allowed
to leave the course and go into town, because they might
be so spaced out that they would do something that could
bring injury to themselves or embarrassment to the TMO.
They cannot be allowed "free time" because they might be
tempted to do something Off The Program during that time.
They cannot be allowed to eat their favorite foods, 
because we know better than they do what they should eat
and not eat. And they should *never* be allowed to 
question the absolute Truth of something said on a tape,
because if it's on one of the tapes, it IS absolute Truth.

I have also had the experience of attending many retreats
and in-residence courses taught or offered by other spir-
itual traditions. On those course, we were treated like
ADULTS. There was always a schedule, but if we chose to
deviate from that schedule and sleep in, or decided to
take a walk by ourselves in the woods instead of attending
a talk, that was fine. There was no *need* to prevent any-
one from "going into town," because the participants on
the course were NOT "spaced out." They were, if anything,
*more* alert and aware and in charge of their critical
faculties than ever. That is, after all, what meditation
is supposed to do for you.

I'm clarifying because I pretty much know that someone is
going to come roaring in here, purple-faced with rage, and
suggest that the View I present of the TM residence course
structure as a form of indoctrination is BAD, and EVIL,
and mean-spirited.

It's not. It's just another View. And I think it's one
that deserves to be considered. Most of us on this forum
spent days, weeks, months and even YEARS in such an
environment as I describe in my first paragraph. It 
became such a *familiar* environment to us that we never
challenged its validity or thought about it as a form
of indoctrination.

But of course it was, and we were all indoctrinated. As
the years went by, the structure of the residence courses
became more and more regimented and severe. I know that
at least one of our number here on FFL was once dragged
before a "tribunal" on an ATR course and threatened with
being sent home and expelled from the TM movement for
the grievous sin of crossing the street from his hotel
and buying an ice cream cone from time to time. His 
"sin" was EATING ICE CREAM."

It wasn't, of course. His "sin" was deviating from WHAT
HE HAD BEEN TOLD TO DO BY HIS BETTERS. That
cannot be countenanced, because he was viewed as a child
and those who told him to do these things were his de
facto parents.

I don't know about you, but I already have a pair of
parents, and even though they are now dead, I don't need
replacements for them from any organization. I'm an
adult, and I expect to be treated like one by any
spiritual tradition I interact with. 



Reply via email to