--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity <no_reply@> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I find your explanation of "dodging questions" to promote the innocent
> > and effortless experience very interesting.  I think there is
> > something to that.   I think that the initiation process puts people
> > in a relaxed and suggestible frame of mind.  The checking process is
> > the same.  Being in that state of mind may make it more likely that TM
> > will be perceived as relaxing and effortless.
> >
> 
> Found an interesting tidbit to add to my post:
> 
> "Walrath and Hamilton (1975) reported that there is some indication
> that TM is related to hypnotic susceptibility.  In their study,
> although only 44% of the non-TM volunteer subjects were rated as
> highly susceptible, with scores of 10 or higher on the Stanford
> Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, 100% of the TM practitioners received
> scores of 11 or 12 on the Stanford Scale.  Walrath and Hamilton
> concluded that either the practice of TM increases susceptibility to
> hypnosis or only highly susceptible subjects find sufficient
> reinforcement in the technique to continue its practice.  Using the
> Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility and the Field Depth of
> Hypnosis Inventory to test hypnosis, Van Nuys (1973) also found that
> hypnotic susceptibility correlated with subjects' initial skill at
> meditating."
> 
> From chapter 3, the Physical and Psychological Effects of Meditation,
> by Murphy and Donovan.  I haven't read the underlying work.  
> 
> My theory is that there are qualities that certain people have that
> make them more likely to find meditation rewarding.
>

Well, duh! The ability to "concentrate" (to "do" dhaaraNaa)
effortlessly, of course! :D

- dhaaraNaasu ca yogyataa manasaH -- MaharSi PataƱjali



Reply via email to