--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > -snip- > > And for some, Faith *IS* "enough." They continue > > to believe today the same stuff they were told 30 > > or more years ago, and they believe it *without* > > the benefit of any Proof. And interestingly these > > people seem to think that the rest of us for whom > > Faith is *NOT* "enough" are somehow weak or flawed > > because we *need* Proof. They don't, after all. > > They are content with Faith. Their *whole argument* > > seems to be that we should have Faith, too. Then > > everything would be OK and we skeptics would lose > > these silly doubts and see the light the way they > > have. > -snip- > > except that you have this ass backwards Barry. the people like me > talking about TM in a positive light are those DOING IT-- the ones > with PROOF. the ones criticizing it are no nothings like you, with > nothing but FAITH in their egos and arrogance to challenge the > experience of the TMers. > > you'll have to try harder than this to bullshit us I am afraid. > > i don't think you are weak or flawed, just arrogant and ego > tripping. PROVE to me that you aren't-lol >
Experience as proof is often an answer to us skeptics. The problem is that your experience is not evidence. It is like having a study where n.=1. No validity to that study. It isn't proof, it is a story. Now if you have a compelling story it might get someone to at least try out TM. Where are the compelling stories on FFL?
