--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcg...@...>
wrote:
>
> This is one of the reasons why I always felt someone like Deepak 
> Chopra should have begun his experience in the TMO as a Flower Boy on 
> Saturday mornings.  Chopra is very much someone who, deservedly, was 
> a star pupil because he studied his ass off...but he was also the 
> Dauphin-like golden boy.
> 
> I think the experience would have humbled him.  It certainly did me 
> and certainly convinced me of the power of the puja.  I would wait 
> outside the doors of the puja room and be the person who would guide 
> the initiates to the room where they do their first meditation.  
> Sitting outside the puja room I would always notice an incredible 
> energy change in the area which exponentially ratcheted up about the 
> time the mantra was given out.  It was incredibly palpable and 
> convinced me that something was happening...yes, I would say that it 
> was the enlivening of the Holy Tradition and, yes, making the 
> recitation of the puja an essential requirement of receiving a mantra.
> 
> And, most definitely "yes", it does toggle the power of the mantra 
> (to use Edg's term, below).  "Toggle" is a really good word to 
> describe it!
> 
> With such an important thing at hand, why would anyone want to take a 
> chance they weren't getting the full effect?


Agreed. Us Saturday morning flower boys are of like mind!

 
> I'm not 100% sure, but I've asked this question before and have been 
> told that in Chopra's meditation technique he doesn't preceed it with 
> a puja.  If true, he's an irresponsible prick who is playing with 
> people in a very irresponsible way.
> 
> Not that what he is teaching them isn't better than them not learning 
> anything at all; only that it is not complete and the effects won't 
> be what they could have been.
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > Rick,
> > 
> > Do you feel the puja etc. is necessary for the technique to "get
> > activated by Guru Dev" or something of that ilk?
> > 
> > Seems to me that an ancient ritual has a chance of helping 
> (deluding?)
> > a newbie to imprint on the technique, so that's a practical benefit,
> > but do you actually think there's something mystical happening that
> > toggles the power of the mantra or its use or that "somehow" primes
> > the pump of the initiate's mind?
> > 
> > I once loved the idea of the 5,000 year tradition being carried
> > forward and that the mantras were as ancient and as long-understood
> > for their effects, but all that was hooey as far as anyone can tell
> > these days since we have no provenance of the mantras.
> > 
> > Why tell your friend to cheat the TMO out of a fee and all that if 
> the
> > dang system of meditating only ended up with a dysfunctional
> > organization of ill repute?  And, hey, if your friend really takes 
> off
> > and has incredible experiences, how is he/she going to approach the
> > TMO to further or intensify their program if they're not officially 
> a
> > paying-member of the TMO?  If the experiences are THERE your friend
> > may be quite vulnerable to many risks when the passion to amp up the
> > results skews their decisions about what organization to become
> > involved with.  Your friend might equally "get off" on an Amma hug, 
> ya
> > see? Where's the beef that your friend thinks he/she's going to 
> get? 
> > Why aren't you more fully advising this person about the vagaries of
> > spiritual methodologies such that a more informed decision 
> about "how
> > to meditate and why to do so" becomes clearer to that person?  
> > 
> > Edg
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote:
> > >
> > > From a friend:
> > > 
> > > A friend of mine is very interested in learning TM, though he 
> cannot 
> > > afford the current fee of $2500. Does anyone know of an 
> independent TM 
> > > teacher who can provide instruction for less, in the San 
> Francisco Bay 
> > > Area? It should still be the TM instruction, with puja, checking 
> and 
> > > all of that. Thanks.
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to