Pot has been used for thousands of years and has never been anything
but a boon to any culture -- until Hearst et al.

To me this illegality of weed issue is such a disconnect.  I can't get
my head around it.  How can ANYONE think that pot is anywhere near as
harmful as alcohol or tobacco use when these two substances are well
known to kill hundreds of thousands of people every year?  I mean,
it's one thing to speak of the potency of Hearst's propaganda, but
when the truth is right there for all the world to see and yet it is
denied, it blows me away.

It is absolutely the commonest experience for almost anyone to have
seen a homeless person with their brown paper bag cheap wine sitting
on some stoop in a haze, or we've all seen a person smoking a
cigarette and coughing a lung up at the same time.  Who doesn't know
these "end results" that usage can create in some lives? 

Yet, anyone seen smoking a joint in a public place will be thought to
be some criminal-at-large who might do anything any second and should
be feared and shamed and abused in any way possible.

I remember living in Arcata, CA for a year, and it was hippy-ville
central. Tie dyes.  Granny dresses. The whole magilla.  

Every Saturday they'd have the farmer's market, and there'd be pot
smoke easily smelled everywhere -- even some folks openly toking
up....cops ignoring it.  I was shocked.  Today, I understand that this
is the case in many other venues now in CA. 

It's about time.  I think the pot heads in Arcata need to learn
something from the Gay Pride movement in SF -- make it a regionally
identified issue and move now, act up, get in faces, be outrageous,
flagrant, and snotty about it.  To hell with anymore submissioning to
haughty moralists with their atomic tsk-tskings.  Have a pot parade
like a gay pride parade with giant hookas, boxcar sized blunts, etc.

If they legalize it in CA, I think it'd be a tipping point for the
whole world.  Amsterdam's example is just not enough, but all of
California?....yeah, now ya gots yourself a tipper.

Edg





--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "boo_lives" <boo_li...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 24, 2009, at 9:42 AM, boo_lives wrote:
> > 
> > > People I know who "see auras" all say that anti-depressants are
about
> > > the worst drug to take, and no-one is in jail for taking and selling
> > > antidepressants, and anti-depressants are much more common among
ffld
> > > sidhas than pot.  I won't even bother to get into alchohol and the
> > > suffering that causes in society and in ffld.
> > 
> > Well maybe your friends who "see auras" ought to
> > go back to the loony bins they obviously
> > escaped from, boo.  Who the hell are they to
> > pass judgements on medication which has helped
> > millions?
> > 
> > Sal
> >
> To clarify I'm not saying that anti-depressant medication can't help
> some people and it's fully up to them to decide what to do. I
> mentioned the aura readers just because someone else did to put down
> cannabis and I wanted to say these people see lots of things and you
> actually shouldn't go by that either way.
> 
> I wanted to point out that our society is bipolar regarding drugs. 
> Antidepressants help some people, but also have many physical side
> effects plus the well known clouding over of the personality and
> emotions for many people, plus a study I saw last week saying that
> certain antidepressants in fact didn't have any benefit at all, plus
> the overprescription of antidepressants to children and to low
> depression patients who could be treated other ways, YET despite all
> this we still find a way to get antidepressants to people who need
> them... but mention cannabis and immediately scenes from reefer
> madness come to mind and teh possibility that some people will have
> negative effects means hundreds of thousands of americans are in jail.
>  I'd like to see more equality in how we view pharmaceutical versus
> non pharmaceutical drugs.
>


Reply via email to