---There's a limitation with such Neo-Advaitic Gnosis:  somebody - 
some body/mind, has to exist in order to report on that Truism as you 
have done.
 No body/mind, then no reportage.  The limitation is in the message.


 In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Dick Richardson" <somerse...@...> 
wrote:
>
> 
> Beyond the Universe of Time and Change.
> 
> 
> 
> [ their "God" is beyond the universe ]
> 
> 
> 
> Never met any of the religionists godo's on my travels. But I did
> find something which was beyond the perception and my memory of the
> physical universe – ME.  But there was nobody else there, no godos,
> no sons of godos, just me – and that divine and wondrous pleroma of
> an eternal NOW. And therein I found my SELF, its very first ground 
of
> conscious existence; Primordial Cognition.  Hell, and I was not even
> looking for it, or anything. Were you made in the same factory?  
Well,
> you find out.
> 
> 
> 
> You say there is a limit to what we can know. I guess you are right 
at
> that. But we can sure KNOW or SELF, and when you know that then you 
know
> what your are NOT. And that is the important bit. Hell, I don't even
> know how to build a computer, or how to build a rocket. But I know 
what
> I am and from whence I came and why. So that will do me for now. I 
found
> it when I was very young, so I had cope with that all my adult life
> – and there is more.  But best not mention that.
> 
> 
> 
> Dick.
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "yifuxero" <yifuxero@> wrote:
> >
> > Among other possible types of limitations: (Scientific American, 
p.
> > 19, March 2009):
> >
> > 1. Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle (HUP). ..."Heisenberg
> > discovered that improved precision regarding, say, an object's
> > position inevitably degraded the level of certainity of its 
momentum."
> >
> > 2. "Kurt Godel showed that within any formal mathematical system
> > advanced enough to be useful, it is impossible to use the system 
to
> > prove evfery true statement that it contains."
> >
> > 3. "...Alan Turing demonstrated that one cannot, in general,
> > determine if a computer algorithm is going to halt".
> >
> > 4. New theorem of David H. Wolpert, NASA Ames Research Center.
> > " ... has chimed in with his version of a knowledge limit. Because
> > of it, he concludes, the universe lies beyond the grasp of any
> > intellect, no matter how powerful, that could exist within the
> > universe." "...no matter what laws of physics govern a universe,
> > there are inevitably facts about the universe that its inhabitants
> > cannot learn by experiment or predict with a computation".
> >
> > [brief comment on the last one. To get around such arguments 
against
> > Omniscience, Fundamentalists are fond of saying that their "God" 
is
> > beyond the universe, thus negating Wolpert's theorem.
> > But various philosophical arguments can be brought to bear on
> > counteracting the Fundies. Some of these will be presented 
shortly.
> >
>


Reply via email to