--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > But there's *no way* people can ever have the > > > complete picture without really getting into it, > > > including plenty of experience of the technique. > > > > > > In between virtually no information about TM's > > > origins and context and full information, there's > > > a big swath of *partial* information that is > > > essentially misleading. If one thinks practice > > > of the TM technique is highly beneficial for > > > most people, and conveying full information > > > isn't a practical option, what does one do? > > > > I think you are confusing the ability to present a > > more complete picture of the TM practice with the > > ability to control how people view and react to > > this information. > > Bingo!!! > > That's exactly it. As far as I can tell, > Judy is convinced that there is a "proper" > or "authoritative" or "correct" "complete > picture of TM practice." > > Coincidentally enough, it happens to be > her view.
In stark contrast to the way you feel about *your* view (both of you), right?
