--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > > > > > Except its not underfunded. The TMO takes care of the > > > teraining of hte kids and the teachers. > > > > PLEASE stop saying this. > > Funny, I don't recall Lawson having said anything > before that could be interpreted to mean he thinks > TM is paying. > > In fact, in a recent post, he said, "The entire > thing is funded by the DLF."
This was all based on his misunderstanding of my statement that our schools are underfunded. I didn't know why he went off on this tangent in the first place. > > Perhaps Barry meant to write "Please DON'T say this"? > I mean, we know he's having quite a struggle today > to express himself clearly. > > > It isn't true and you know it. The TMO is not > > putting a PENNY of its own money on the line. > > Reasonable people who weren't looking for an excuse > to put down a TMer would assume, given the givens, > that Lawson didn't intend to suggest the TMO was > funding it, that he meant something else entirely. > > I'm not sure exactly what he *did* mean, but one > could always ask before activating one's peashooter > (not to mention falsely suggesting Lawson had > previously said what one is shooting at when he > hadn't). > > > Stop perpetuating something that even YOU > > know is a lie, Lawson. > > Oh, my, I guess Barry didn't mean "DON'T say this." > He *did* mean to suggest (knowingly falsely) that > Lawson had been saying it all along. > > So much for giving Barry the benefit of the doubt. >