--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunsh...@...> wrote: > > On Apr 5, 2009, at 10:27 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote: > > > You have plenty of emotion that you express in your > > positions here. Neither of us are summing up your > > objections as stemming from a psychological problem > > you have. Is it too much to ask for this courtesy > > in return? > > In Judy's case, yes. That's apparently the only > way she wants to deal with legitimate objections-- > villify the messenger--read their minds--use manipulation > and fake "concern" instead of responding rationally.
Note how carefully Sal snipped what Curtis had said just above what she quoted: "You have plenty of legitimate challenges to both of our POVs here." Amazing. And of course she bought Curtis's misunderstanding-- that I was "summing up [their] objections as stemming from a psychological problem [they] have"--hook, line, and sinker. Never suggested that about either of them. > Which is why I don't deal with her any more...there's > no honor amongst thieves, or, it would seem, > manipulators and phonies. The reason Sal doesn't deal with me any more is that she isn't up to it. If I were her, I wouldn't be accusing others of lacking honor and being manipulators and phonies.
