--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunsh...@...> wrote: <snip> > In Judy's case, yes. That's apparently the only > way she wants to deal with legitimate objections-- > villify the messenger--read their minds--use manipulation > and fake "concern" instead of responding rationally. And then > she accuses others of being "distraught." Which is > why I don't deal with her any more...there's no honor > amongst thieves, or, it would seem, manipulators and phonies.
One more example of the hypocrisy of Sal's statement: She accuses me of mind-reading while happily doing it herself. And of course she'd never accuse *Barry* of mind-reading when he's attacking me. Just the latest of innumerable examples: "Judy and those who believe as she does are the 'elite.' They were 'evolved' enough to appreciate the great gifts that Maharishi sold them and 'capable' of 'having good results.' Ruth, ignoramus and 'incapable' as she is, was not. "THAT is the message that Judy is trying to convey. Curtis is being easy on the bitch. I have no such reservations. "Judy's ENTIRE position is that anyone who does not agree with her as to 1) what Maharishi 'really meant' when he said things, 2) what his 'message' really was, 3) what the 'benefit' of that message was, and 4) pretty much anything else she has an opinion on is a LOSER. They are somehow LESS than she is, 'incapable' of seeing how profound the things she believes are pro- found 'really' are." The difference, incidentally, between my "mind- reading" and Barry's is that mine is done in accord with what people actually *say*, whereas Barry simply makes up stuff that he likes the sound of. None of his "readings" above have anything to do with what I've said and are very largely, in fact, *contrary* to what I've said.
