--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > agreed-- as has been said, there is no such > > thing as bad publicity. and that goes for the > > TM and MMY bashers here too- just by > > criticizing and bashing TM they continue > > to keep it alive in the minds of those who > > read these posts. after some time all people > > remember was a discussion on TM, not what was > > said. its why people like Martha Stewart are > > still celebrities. keep it up! > > If that were really true, then there is no > basis for the position taken by Judy and > Raunchydog (and by the TMO's/Lynch Foun- > dation's scumbag of a lawyer) that John > Knapp and others expressing their critical > points of view about TM, the TMO, and > Maharishi should not be allowed to happen.
None of the TM critics here will have the guts to call Barry on this lie about me and raunchydog. Neither of us has ever taken the position that expressing critical points of view about TM "should not be allowed to happen." Who are the folks on this forum who *have* taken the "should not be allowed to happen" position? The TM *critics*. It's the hypocrisy, stupid.
