--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "geezerfreak" <geezerfr...@...> wrote: > > Judy, I didn't respond to you because I've concluded > that word wrestling with you is about as useful as > arguing with Nabby or WillyTex. I don't have time time > to get into convoluted dialogs with you. I don't have > time to get into convoluted dialogs with anyone here > for that matter. I check in when I get a moment, post > quick comments when I'm able and move on to to other > pressing matters. You've made it clear over the years > that "winning" is of utmost importance to you. While, > I've enjoyed a few posts of yours concerning food or > birds, I find the endless "you're lying and you know > it" crap to be tiring and mind-numbingly boring. > > That's why I don't rumble in the jungle with you.
Wise man. Add to what you said, however, the fact that the person trying to taunt you into entering an argument with her is the person who recently defined a good discussion (à la a.m.t.) as one that she could prolong until it was "100 posts deep." Since saying that, she has tried to taunt at least four people into such an argument. And it never even *occurs* to her that by saying what she's trying to do (lure people into end- less arguments) and then attempting to do just that she might be shooting herself in the foot. That's our Judy. Not just an attention vampire, but a stupid attention vampire.
