> > Of course should something eventually come out > > on TM that is reputable, worthwhile and new--sure > > I'd love to hear it. I'm just not holding my > > breath on that one. The same old relaxation > > response findings just aren't that exciting for > > those of us interested in higher states of > > consciousness. > > TurquoiseB wrote: > An interesting parallel to the thousands who, > unlike some who found Maharishi's talks brilliant > and incisive, moved on to some other teacher who > didn't recycle the same mind-pablum ad absurdum. > "The more you give, the more people we can help." - Frederick Lenz http://www.ex-cult.org/Groups/Rama/wired
> Interestingly enough, the ones who never tired > of Maharishi saying the same old things are the > ones who still claim to find the "TM science" > believable. > > It's just like kids, in a way. Some like to hear > the same old bedtime stories read to them over > and over and over. Others edit the same old > stories and try to find new ways to tell them > and new ways to sell them and think of that as > being "creative." Yet others grow up to write > their own stories. Call me silly, but I'm going > to reserve the word "creative" for those who > actually create something new. >
