On May 6, 2009, at 10:14 AM, grate.swan wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradh...@...> wrote:
On May 6, 2009, at 9:37 AM, grate.swan wrote:
Buddhist traditions of samadhi, and while the number of angas does
vary, the insistence of their sequential performance in all Hindu
yogic literature is quite notable, so much so that the
"mechanics" of
it has been delineated. And thus the yogic saying 'Those who
skip the
prerequisites of samadhi (i.e. the angas), even if they meditate
for
hundreds of years, will never attain samadhi.'
And you base your point on one esoteric saying translated from
centuries ago across probably multiple languages?
I am not defending the opposite, but you seem to hardly made a case
for your view.
Don't assume I was interested in going into any lengthy defense. It's
worthless to do such a thing here any longer.
Really this is a kind of "yoga 101" revelation, it should hardly be
surprising. Not to sound offensive but if you're that ignorant of
basic yogic teachings, I'd recommend cracking a book or two first. I
base my observations on my own direct experience and being taught by
a lineal teacher who was part of a line that had been replicating the
same results for centuries. The Patanjali tradition.
Thanks for pointing out my huge omission to my list of 6 year old's
arguments the to questions about their claims (of stronger dads and
better gizmos)
3) "You are so stupid (and thus I am not going to say more)"
LOL, Is this where you throw yourself on the ground and have a tantrum?
I'll continue to interject when I want, as I feel appropriate. It's
not my job to educate you or make up for your own lack of experience!
