--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradh...@...> wrote: > > > On May 5, 2009, at 8:44 PM, sparaig wrote: > > >> They seem to be operating on the premise that "you can fool some of > >> the people most of the time". Make no mistake, ADHD and meditation > >> has a potential to make some big $$$ for the TMO, so they will no > >> doubt continue to attempt to get into school districts with there > >> "science" and they will try to get it used for cardiac patients, > >> another mistake. > >> > >> There has been some validated success with ADHD and other forms of > >> meditation, so I suspect they'll try to ride on the backs of them. > >> > > > > But of course, neither Fred Travis nor Alaric Arenander nor any > > other TM researcher > > could possibly perform legitimate positive research on ADHD and TM... > > > Well, I think you need to ask some different questions, namely, can an > actual attentional improvement be found in the subjects, will they be > randomized AND will that stand when compared to good controls, not > just some lame controls? Of course if they're to prove attentional > resiliency, they also need to show neuroplastic changes. There are a > new and growing list of criteria in this area. >
Right and Fred and Aleric have never mentioned neoplsticity in any TM context... And Hari Sharma wasn't talking about free radicals and MAK 20 years ago because he was an ignorant fool Lawson
