--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > <snip> > > If you *weren't* Hillarybots In Denial, WHY > > would you be so defensive? > > > > For example, try to find a post in which I > > (whom you both characterize as an "Obamanaut" > > have *ever* reacted self-defensively to criti- > > cism of Obama. > > If Barry isn't an Obamanaut in denial, why is he > being so defensive? > > > I doubt you'll be able to find one (although the > > thought of Judy spending hours trying brings a > > smile to my lips). > > No need. Barry handed me one on a silver platter > in the very same post in which he accuses *us* of > being defensive.
LOL. This is clearly the TM version of the phrase that race bigots who use it don't realize is as offensive as their mindset is: "That's white of you." Knowing that she would be *unable* to find any posts in which I responded self-defensively to criticism of Obama, Judy suggests that me stating the fact that she can't find one is a defense of self. That's TM of you, Judy. :-) Bottom line is that she *can't* find such a post. I don't really CARE what users of Hillary Dildos(tm) or anyone else thinks about Obama. What they think of him does not affect me in the least. But the moment anyone suggests that she and Raunchydog care VERY MUCH when someone suggests that their *ongoing* ragging on Obama is based more on being in-the-closet Hillary fangirls than it is rationality, they *have* to "defend themselves." "The lady doth protest too much, methinks." -- William Shakespeare, who wrote so eloquently about Hillary Clinton during her incarnation as Lady Macbeth
