Somebody get him some help, please.

--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
> Please note that ALL of this is a distraction
> from the fact...

...that Barry lied about deceptively snipping my
post, got caught, then lied again by claiming *I*
lied, and got caught *again*.

 that Judy was caught in a lie
> claiming that she had never demonized those
> who disagree with her

That, of course, was not a lie.

 attachment to Woo Woo
> with regard to crop circles.

But this is. It's an example of why I've been
criticizing the skeptopaths. It's a straw man.

> She sought to "prove" that by claiming that
> I snipped parts of a post *in which* she
> demonizes them.

*But not for disagreeing with me*, which is what
the two paragraphs Barry snipped pointed out (the
ones he quotes below).

That's why he snipped them.

He's known from the start what I was referring
to, because he snipped the paragraphs quite
deliberately. His claim that I was lying about
not demonizing people for disagreeing with me
would have made no sense if he'd included those
paragraphs.

The skeptopaths haven't been disagreeing with
me, they've been bravely disagreeing with
their own straw men. *That's* what I've been
criticizing them for doing--not for disagreeing
with me, but for *not having the guts to
disagree with me*.

Barry understands this all too well, because
he's been one of the cowards disagreeing with
his own straw men.

Not to mention his cowardice in lying about
what he snipped, then lying about *my* having
lied, and not being able to admit it when it's
all laid out in black and white.


 Which she then reposted.  :-)
> 
> THIS is what she cited as a distraction, hoping
> to "prove" that she had never demonized those
> who disagree with her:
> 
> > What I'm berating the skeptopaths for is
> > their cowardice. They don't have the cojones
> > to disagree with me on the basis of what I've
> > said and the information I've pointed to.
> > 
> > Instead they create armies of straw men and
> > beat *them* up, then pound their chests as if
> > they'd actually accomplished something. Losers.
> 
> What a loon.
> 
> Let's see how she tries to spin *this*.  :-)
>


Reply via email to