> > As for colorful language in the things Edg and some > > others write, we'll let that slide as long as it's > > in context and not gratuitive. > > It's a tough call, because it's a matter of deciding > what might be offensive enough to a visitor that they'd > go and report us to Yahoo.
Someone should point out that it's not a *visitor* that we have to fear "reporting us to Yahoo." The only incident designed to get Fairfield Life shut down came from a TM TB meditator, a siddha who claims to regularly attend WPA's in Fairfield. Speaks volumes, doesn't it? A "visitor" wouldn't give a shit. Only someone who was seriously ATTACHED -- either to his ego or his beliefs or both -- and who was not only so full of samskaras that he forms grudges and holds onto them for years *but who feels entitled to ACT on those grudges* would be someone who would "report FFL to Yahoo" for anything said here. And do we have a few of those? You betcha. There's a "scientific study" in that somewhere...