--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> wrote: > <snip> > > I'm not saying I'm for or against gay marriage; what > > I'm saying is if you hold it to be equal to > > heterosexual marriage then you should treat gay porn > > just as you would hetero porn...and if looking at it > > shocks you, well then, good, you may have to rethink > > your position. > > In other words, you're against gay marriage. > > What in heaven's name does being or not being > shocked by porn have to do with supporting gay > marriage?? > > Nobody's saying that if gays are allowed to get > married, we all have to look at gay porn. Or, for > that matter, even think about what gay people do > in bed. > > Does being in favor of heterosexual marriage mean > you have to look at heterosexual porn or think about > what other heterosexuals do in bed? (Me, I'd rather > *do* it than look at it.) > > If all you can think about when the topic of gay > marriage comes up is what gays do in bed, you've got > a *big* problem. > > And I seem to recall you have quite a fondness for > watching lesbian love scenes. Are you suggesting > lesbians should be allowed to get married but not > gay men? >
I'm not saying anyone should or shouldn't get married. What I'm saying is that we shouldn't have double standards. For gay marriage? Then be for polygamy, gay polygamy, incest, bestiality, etc.