--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > I see this whole compulsion of Maharishi's to > "reinterpret" the world's religions and "recast" > them in terms of TM as an extension of Hinduism > and its original co-opting of the Buddha. Same > thing exactly...if you can find some way to claim > that the original competing tradition was "really" > teaching the same thing that the TMO teaches, but > in a "lesser," less-fully-understood way, you > simultaneously 1) put that other tradition down, > and 2) co-opt it to some extent so that your own > students won't be tempted to check it out and thus > "stray from the highest path." And, in so doing, > take their money somewhere else (or keep it, > because many of these other traditions teach for > free). >
yeah, corrupted in ego of packaging and marketing; said strictly as that is said, u r wrongish otherwise. More Largely is Just that Science is repeatable in nature. There is justice in that. Really it is all Patanjali. All renders down on Patanjali. buddhistic, hinduistic, gnostic mystical x-ian, judeoistic, proly somewhere in mohammadism. Patanjali just happens to more clearly say it in writing. Is all one when it works. !Jai Patanjali! -D in FF
