From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ShempMcGurk Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 12:26 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: "Avatar", as seen through the eyes of Shemp --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "Rick Archer" <r...@...> wrote: > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> ] > On Behalf Of ShempMcGurk > Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 12:16 PM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: "Avatar", as seen through the eyes of Shemp > > Actually, very few climatologists agree that there is catastrophic man-made > global warming, Rick. > In the Shempoverse, that is true. In the real world, as evidenced by the > link I posted (http://tinyurl.com/yd5sqm7 is a better one if you'd like > multiple references), it isn't. > I mean real, non-biassed scientists, of course, Rick. Translation: fringe "scientists" who agree with your misguided opinion. How many of those listed got their research money from government? All scientists get their research money from somewhere. Mostly either the government or corporations, I suppose. Are you suggesting that government-funded research is more biased than corporate-funded research? If so, why? Corporations are beholden to their shareholders and are notorious for doctoring research to protect the bottom line. Politicians are also corrupt insofar as they are bought and sold by corporations, which in our country they are to a disgusting degree. Hence, many politicians sing the same song you're singing. What do they care? By the time Florida is under water, they'll be long gone.
