Hugo: > I've been running with the simple ethics of > whether it's right to claim they have a basis > in physics - without carrying out any double > blind tests... > Most scientific testing doesn't involve double- blind testing, and I'd say that physics doesn't have an ethical component. Besides this, it has already been demonstrated that you and Curtis have a prejudice against some spiritual groups.
> There are some serious karma issues here for > sure... > What makes you so sure? Has it been proved with any kind of double-blind testing that there is a law of moral reciprocity? I don't think so. If 'karma' was a law of physics, then good people that do good things would be rewarded; and bad people that do bad things would be punished. But we both know that physics doesn't work like this, Hugo. The question you're trying to answer is 'What makes acts right'? That's a subjective evaluation based on personal ethics, not science.
