A message of peace is fine, but attaching that message to a charlatan isn't.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony...@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> >wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > ><curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > No problem curtis, but is wasn't posted with you in mind > > > > > but for that serious soul who might read it and not > > > > > necessarily respond. > > > > > > > > > > At least not with the endless drivel we have become so > > > > > all too familiar with coming from your keyboard. > > > > > > > > If I was looking for some "serious soul" it wouldn't be > > > > from anyone impressed with what we have heard from Maitreya > > > > so far. > > > > > > So you have actually heard from Maitreya curtis ? > > > How impressive ! May I ask where and when ? > > > Or only more drivel and gross inaccuracies ? > > > > Nabby, I suspect that Curtis means what Creme > > has reported Maitreya as "saying." I think you > > both know that neither Curtis nor I (and in fact > > 99.9999% percent of the human population) do not > > believe that such a being as Maitreya exists, or > > will ever exist. We believe that it would be far > > more like to "hear from" Santa Claus than > > "Maitreya." > > > > That said, it has become apparent that not only > > do you believe that Creme is correct and Maitreya > > both exists and is about to come out of the avatar > > closet in a big way, you will pretty much continue > > to believe it no matter HOW embarrassing it gets. > > > > My questions to you -- out of curiosity, not malice > > -- is "What will you do if Benjamin Creme kicks the > > bucket and Maitreya hasn't shown up yet? How long > > will you *keep* believing in a Maitreya who never > > appears?" > > > > I consider these sensible questions. My "take" on > > Creme's appearance in his most recent "announce- > > ments" is that he's very ill and possibly "circling > > the drain," incarnation-wise. I suspect he'll be > > dead within a year. No malice on my part in saying > > this; that's just how his state of health appeared > > to me in the video, combined with his real age. > > > > IF that happens, and there has been No Maitreya, > > what do YOU do? > > > > Do you keep waiting for the promised Messiah until > > YOU die, or what? > > > > Could there EVER be a point at which you might > > admit that you had been lied to, and systematically, > > for 30 years by Benjamin Creme? > > > > And as a final question, can you admit that there > > is even the POSSIBILITY that Maitreya does not > > exist and never did? Is such a thing conceivable > > to you? > > > > Thanks for considering these things, if you do. > > I really *don't* dislike you, although I laugh > > at you often. Mainly, I'm curious as to how some- > > one could believe this stuff for so long without > > a shred of proof that any of it ever was true. > > If you'd like to expound upon WHY you believe > > this, as a religious sociologist (even though > > a low-vibe one from your POV) I'd be really > > interested. > > > > Turq > > > > > Turq you're way too hardened on this. Nab got your goat. > Is a brilliant street theatre on their parts. > Seeing Benjamin Crème for the first time just now I was awed. The Quaker in > the > woods. A modern John the Baptist comes before. 1st proclaiming the way. > Is brilliant Quaker theatre with message. & With our Nablusoss a part in it. > > Doing your best here to take Nab down and kick him, but when Benjamin > Crème dies he'll proly get more powerful than ever regardless. His 'work is > finished'. Look at those crowds, those auditoriums. The message of simple > peace. > > > By way of show comparison, what have you done to promote a better life? > And what do you have again against the message of need in Peace? > > With Fond Regards, > -Buck >