A message of peace is fine, but attaching that message to a charlatan isn't. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony...@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> >wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
> > > ><curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> >wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > No problem curtis, but is wasn't posted with you in mind 
> > > > > but for that serious soul who might read it and not 
> > > > > necessarily respond.
> > > > > 
> > > > > At least not with the endless drivel we have become so 
> > > > > all too familiar with coming from your keyboard.
> > > > 
> > > > If I was looking for some "serious soul" it wouldn't be 
> > > > from anyone impressed with what we have heard from Maitreya 
> > > > so far.
> > > 
> > > So you have actually heard from Maitreya curtis ?  
> > > How impressive ! May I ask where and when ?
> > > Or only more drivel and gross inaccuracies ?
> > 
> > Nabby, I suspect that Curtis means what Creme 
> > has reported Maitreya as "saying." I think you
> > both know that neither Curtis nor I (and in fact
> > 99.9999% percent of the human population) do not
> > believe that such a being as Maitreya exists, or
> > will ever exist. We believe that it would be far
> > more like to "hear from" Santa Claus than 
> > "Maitreya."
> > 
> > That said, it has become apparent that not only
> > do you believe that Creme is correct and Maitreya
> > both exists and is about to come out of the avatar
> > closet in a big way, you will pretty much continue
> > to believe it no matter HOW embarrassing it gets.
> > 
> > My questions to you -- out of curiosity, not malice
> > -- is "What will you do if Benjamin Creme kicks the
> > bucket and Maitreya hasn't shown up yet? How long
> > will you *keep* believing in a Maitreya who never
> > appears?"
> > 
> > I consider these sensible questions. My "take" on
> > Creme's appearance in his most recent "announce-
> > ments" is that he's very ill and possibly "circling
> > the drain," incarnation-wise. I suspect he'll be 
> > dead within a year. No malice on my part in saying
> > this; that's just how his state of health appeared
> > to me in the video, combined with his real age.
> > 
> > IF that happens, and there has been No Maitreya,
> > what do YOU do?
> > 
> > Do you keep waiting for the promised Messiah until
> > YOU die, or what?
> > 
> > Could there EVER be a point at which you might 
> > admit that you had been lied to, and systematically,
> > for 30 years by Benjamin Creme?
> > 
> > And as a final question, can you admit that there
> > is even the POSSIBILITY that Maitreya does not
> > exist and never did? Is such a thing conceivable
> > to you?
> > 
> > Thanks for considering these things, if you do.
> > I really *don't* dislike you, although I laugh
> > at you often. Mainly, I'm curious as to how some-
> > one could believe this stuff for so long without
> > a shred of proof that any of it ever was true.
> > If you'd like to expound upon WHY you believe
> > this, as a religious sociologist (even though
> > a low-vibe one from your POV) I'd be really 
> > interested.
> > 
> > Turq
> >
> 
> 
> Turq you're way too hardened on this. Nab got your goat.  
> Is a brilliant street theatre on their parts.  
> Seeing Benjamin Crème for the first time just now I was awed.  The Quaker in 
> the 
> woods.  A modern John the Baptist comes before. 1st proclaiming the way.
> Is brilliant Quaker theatre with message.   & With our Nablusoss a part in it.
> 
> Doing your best here to take Nab down and kick him, but when Benjamin
> Crème dies he'll proly get more powerful than ever regardless.  His 'work is 
> finished'.  Look at those crowds, those auditoriums.  The message of simple 
> peace.
> 
> 
> By way of show comparison, what have you done to promote a better life?
>  And what do you have again against the message of need in Peace?
> 
> With Fond Regards,
> -Buck
>


Reply via email to