--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltabl...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > snip > > > > Given his looks and charisma, I'll bet he gets *lots* of > > odd and potentially distracting attention, not just from > > Creme-ites. Hope he can keep a handle on his ego. And I'm > > a little concerned about his becoming Oprahfied and then > > dismissed as just another New Age type by the folks who > > really need to hear what he's saying. > > He has zero New Age vibe for me. I really appreciate that he is honest about > his Atheism. It isn't popular. > > > > > (If I were his publicity person, I'd try to talk him into > > getting some speech therapy for his stammer when he's > > speaking extemporaneously. It makes him look unsure of > > himself, which he clearly is not!) > > I think that is his "Hugh Grant move." Hot guys like that need to have > imperfections so they seem approachable. Or so I've heard... > > > > > Plenty of interesting stuff on his Web site: > > > > http://rajpatel.org/ > > Yeah look at his number one hidden cost item: > > #1 Women's work The world wouldn't turn without the work of raising > children, and caring for family and community. But it's the work that is most > often and quite literally taken for granted. If the work that women did were > to be paid, how much would it cost? Researchers put it at $11 trillion in > 1995, or half the world's total output. Movements demanding a basic income > grant are laying the foundations for this new way of working and living. > Valuing women's work would, more than any other single thing, transform the > way we think about our economy and society. >
Will mothers get performance reviews? If under performing do they get sacked? Do fathers get anything? (no pointed editorial comment here).
