> > Willy just admitted he is a teabagger so we now > > definitely know how stupid he is though I think > > we've known that for years. > > Vaj: > Are you sure this doesn't mean Willy is actually > showing up on college campuses and placing his > "teabags" over drunken frat-boys passed-out eyes > and snapping a quick picture with his Polaroid? > Ouch! You really got back at me this time, Vaj.
I didn't realize how upset you were going to be when I revealed how unethical your teachers were. The truth sometimes really hurts, when you realize you've been duped for forty years into buying into the snake oil business. I empathize with you, Bro! > Willy, which kind of teabagger are you? > But, it's true - you can call me 'Willy' or you can call me a 'teabagger' if that helps you to make me less human. Sometimes that helps people who can't win a debate - they resort to saying things and calling people names, and it makes them feel better, I guess. So, I guess I proved my point, Vaj - your teachers were unethical, and now you are too. None of your teachers were enlightened - and you all exhibit a lack of ethics, even in a minor debate on the internet. The arguementum ad hominiem attack is the second to last resort of someone who is loosing a debate and is unable to respond with legitimacy. The last resort (most difficult for the ego) is to admit that he or she might be wrong.
