--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > I think I've detected a trend here. Stung by my recent > > > posts asking people to pay attention to the *intent* of > > > her posts, not the content, THE CORRECTOR has begun > > > limiting herself to one gratuitous and unnecessary > > > "Barry Bash" per day. :-) > > > > > > It won't last. The "Inquisition Mindset" always wins > > > out. :-) > > > > It won't "last" because it never existed. As with so > > many others of your claims, it's a product of the > > fantasies your mind automatically generates when you've > > been caught out on something. :-) > > Just because it's fun, WHY should we not construe > your "comeback" as not referring to YOU and YOUR > actions, and YOUR behavior when "caught out on > something?" The facts are there on FFL in this > case.
Lots of facts are here on FFL. Just not the ones you've hallucinated to make yourself feel better. > Also, just because it's fun, since you mentioned > "solipsism" recently in one of your gratuitous, > unnecessary "Bash Barry" posts, have you even > *noticed* that no one "piles on" to them the way > you want them to any more? And that no one (other > than Nabby and Willytex) even *reacts* to them? I don't pay any attention to "pile-ons." Obviously you've been keeping careful track. > T'would seem that the "audience poll" suggests that > you have finally achieved the same level of ignor- > ability as Willytex. Congratulations. :-) Barry, dear, this fantasy doesn't suddenl become true just because you've repeated it one more time. :-)
