Perhaps they worry one could be practicing another technique, and result in destructive interference. I don't want to say this too loudly lest David OJ use this as a reason the ME effect has not alwasy worked as advertised. If he were to determine that some participants were practicing a diffferent "program", then he could assign a mathematical value to that, and "voila", you suddenly have a "means deriritive impacting the statistical model plus or minus the standard deriviation formula".
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ditzyklanmail <carc...@...> wrote: > > With silence in the domes, why would anyone be banned for what happens > outside the domes, if their meditation is what is important? > > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: TurquoiseB <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Sun, 23 May, 2010 5:27:02 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Spirit a priori > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > > > On Behalf Of ditzyklanmail > > > > > > > > Pardon my asking, but how can someone get kicked out of the > > > > domes and not be in good standing? > > > > > > In my case it was for being involved with Amma. Not sure what > > > Buck's crime was. > > > > Do you really believe that your mudslinging and rumourmonging > > towards Maharishi has nothing to do with it ? > > And would "mudslinging" and one's willingness to pass > along *public knowledge of Maharishi's past* be Bad > Things, sufficient to require "banning from the domes?" > > Just curious... >
