--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" <geezerfr...@...> wrote: > > You're a mess Judy. "Tell me what you think I'm not already > aware of or haven't considered or currently hold a contrary > opinion about." Is the thought of confrontation the motivation > you need to read something?
No, dear. You said it "really would cause" me to ponder. I'm trying to find out what you thought it would cause me to ponder *about*. I'm not particularly interested in reading something that just confirms my opinions and doesn't give me any information I don't already know about, you see. > Read it or don't read it. I could care less. > > Your insatiable Barry fixation is the primary reason why > so few choose to interact with you anymore. Surely you > know this? I know this is a mantra Barry hopefully repeats over and over, but it's a false premise, as you'd discover if you weren't inclined to just swallow everything he says as if it were gospel and actually observed my interactions. Nice try; no cigar, sorry. > I have a a very satisfying and enjoyable life. The thought > of wasting any more of it rolling around in your Barry > obsessed world makes me ill. Why do you continue to do something that makes you ill to think about? > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" <geezerfreak@> wrote: > > > > > > OK Judy. What exactly are the thoughts of mine that are > > > "obvious to anybody"? > > > > What I said at the beginning. You having memory problems too? > > > > > About the book chapter: you want me to regurgitate the 46 > > > pages of content from that chapter? > > > > You *are* having memory problems. > > > > No, as I already said, tell me what you think I'm not already > > aware of or haven't considered or currently hold a contrary > > opinion about. > > > > > > > > > > For what purpose? I found the chapter highly intriguing and as worthwhile > > today as it was when written in 1991. Not once did the thought of you or > > Barry cross my mind while reading it. Hard to believe for you I'm > > sure.....to think that everything isn't somehow Barry/Judy centric. > > > > > > Pick the book up. It'll cost you $5 max. I've told people what I think > > > and have suggested to Sal that she contact the current Chief of Police to > > > find out the FF crime rate statistics for the period of 1990-2010. > > > > > > Instead of blathering on with your Barry fantasies, why not read the > > > chapter and tell us what you think? > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" <geezerfreak@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Ahhh, that's right. I forgot, you're convinced that you know > > > > > everyone's inner thoughts. > > > > > > > > No, just the ones that are obvious to anybody. > > > > > > > > > (And I thought Ravi-Guru needed help!) > > > > > > > > > > What will the book chapter cause you to ponder? Why don't > > > > > you read it and find out. > > > > > > > > No, you tell me. Let's see what you think I'm not > > > > already aware of or haven't considered or currently > > > > hold a contrary opinion about. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But here's a clue: it has nothing to do with Barry. > > > > > > > > > > ....which probably means you'll have no interest in pursuing it. > > > > > > > > > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" <geezerfreak@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lordy gal, your obsession knows no bounds. Talk about > > > > > > > seeing everything through Barry colored glasses! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, my dear I was bringing attention to, for the second time, > > > > > > > the chapter in D'Antonios' book that deals with Fairfield. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure, Joe, sure you were. You just *happened* to be > > > > > > reminded of that chapter by my post pointing out Barry's > > > > > > memory failure. > > > > > > > > > > > > <snicker> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Instead of spending yet another Sunday of your life > > > > > > > obsessing over Barry why don't you do something that > > > > > > > really will cause you to ponder....order the book > > > > > > > from Amazon. You can get it for less than $10 since > > > > > > > it's available used. > > > > > > > > > > > > What will it cause me to ponder, Joe? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" <geezerfreak@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB > > > > > > > > > > <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > > > The moment that the TMO rebranded its Purpose in > > > > > > > > > > > terms of the Maharishi Effect, it declared in no > > > > > > > > > > > uncertain > > > > > > > > > > > terms that "We" were the Most Important People On The > > > > > > > > > > > Planet, the only ones who could save it from impending > > > > > > > > > > > doom and Kaliyuga Konsciousness. Not my kinda scene... > > > > > > > > > > > glad I missed it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, you've just conveniently forgotten it. It wasn't > > > > > > > > > > ever *not* part of the TMO's purpose. MMY had predicted it > > > > > > > > > > in 1960; it was officially dubbed the Maharishi Effect in > > > > > > > > > > 1975 with the publication of the initial two 1% cities > > > > > > > > > > crime rate studies, before the TM-Sidhis. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Speaking of crime rates and TM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Says Joe, adroitly leaping to distract attention from > > > > > > > > yet another of Barry's memory failures... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ROFL! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , in the book Heaven On Earth, Michael D'Antonio decides, after > > > > > > > > having heard in Fairfield that groups of meditators create a > > > > > > > > "wave of coherence" that lowers crime rates, to visit the > > > > > > > > Fairfield Chief of Police, Randy Cooksie. D'Antonio figured > > > > > > > > that Fairfield, with its higher percentage of meditators than > > > > > > > > any other city in the world, would be a perfect "lab" for > > > > > > > > testing the theory. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chief Cooksie pulls years worth of "call reports" from the > > > > > > > > > 70s, 80s up until the date of this visit in 1990. There had > > > > > > > > > been a steady increase in the Fairfield crime rate throughout > > > > > > > > > the 80s and there was no sign of any slackening in 1990. > > > > > > > > > Cooksie reported to D'Antonio that the (then) MIU campus had > > > > > > > > > its share of crimes, mostly theft, and that the three rapes > > > > > > > > > he had investigated over the past year involved victims and > > > > > > > > > suspects from MIU. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone know the current Chief of Police in Fairfield? It > > > > > > > > > would be interesting to find out how the crime rate had > > > > > > > > > changed in FF since that time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
