I think Barry boy has some problems. He states he likes to listen to experience and not psychology 'theories'. He dosen't understand why does a boner arise the first place (evolution)
--- On Sun, 6/13/10, WillyTex <willy...@yahoo.com> wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Desire To Be Perceived As Authoritative0 Date: Sunday, June 13, 2010, 7:44 AM So, enlightenment is by your definition, the sense of 'Wonder' you feel when you meditate on the 'Truth'. FairfieldLife/message/249795 That's one of the myths that TMers like to rap about. You 'walk the walk' by sending messages from cafes expounding on psychological states without even having read a single book or attended a single class in Psychology 101? So, I guess that's a wrap on this subject. But, you'd think that you would have at least read one book on psychology by Abraham Maslow or Carl Jung! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archetype You claimed to have read over 200 books on the Cathars, but not a single book on the Gnostics. Everyone knows that Bogumils are derivbed from Paulicans, Paulicans from Manicheans, Manicheans from Gnostics and the Cathars are derived from Gnostics. Subject: Cathars are derived from Gnostics Author: Kater Moggin Newsgroups: alt.religion.gnostic Date: May 10, 2007 http://tinyurl.com/25ynndy The question is, why would anyone rap about psychology or the Gnostics when they obviously don't know anything about either? It doesn't make any sense to rap about 'enlightenment' when you haven't even experienced it. Go figure.
