> > > Well, the other 'thing' really besides 'funding' people to meditate in the > domes would be rescinding the administrative DADT policy for those meditators > who would like to join and could join the group meditations in the domes > doing TM and the TM-Siddhis. The remedy is quite simple and in the hands of > the TMo. They don't have enough people around to just pay anymore. In fact, > they need to come to terms with the meditating community if they would really > like to have their numbers where they would like them. This is a 20 year > problem they have let fester. > > > > Their tragedy (the TMo's) is that neither of the theorem #1 or #2 will get > close to being tested either way no matter how much the true-believers might > wish, if their own old problem of excluding meditators over visiting > spiritual healers and other spiritual saints is not simply and directly > nullified. > > They have an old administrative problem that has become cultural which they > are going to have to deal with internally to get the meditating community > back together in the domes otherwise. It appears that won't happen easily > before the Trustees might with strong backbones remove some very large > body(s) in the way. > > God help them. > > Jai Adi Shankara, > -Buck >
I went up to the hardware store the other day and stopped for coffee also along the way. As I went along I asked meditators if they were in the domes(?) and found seven people in passing who were not in the domes because they have gone to see the lady saints. I asked each if they would be willing to go to the domes, if they were simply asked to do TM and TM-siddhis(?)with the group in the domes. They all said 'yes'. The movement evidently has an administrative (cultural) problem with the meditating community. Buck in FF
