authfriend wrote: > <snip> > >> When I find such items on web pages I know will bring >> hackles from the peanut gallery about the "messenger" >> the solution is often a click away at the top of the >> article which contains a link to the original. >> > > That's what *I* suggested to Brian, that he cite the > Bloomberg piece itself rather than the Story Web site. > Apparently you didn't read my posts very carefully. >
So I recommended the same thing. What of it?
