From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 5:24 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Robes of Silk, Feet of Clay/Judith Bourque --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "Rick Archer" <r...@...> wrote: > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> ] > On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 3:38 PM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Robes of Silk, Feet of Clay/Judith Bourque > > > Is that so ? You're greatly misinformed. > > Watch the Larry King interview > <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0icNZnUxYo0> > > . This was taped quite late in his life. King asked him if he had any > > children, and he said he was a monk. > > How can you claim that He was not a monk at this time ? > That wasn't King's question. He asked whether MMY had any children. They > might have been 40 years old for all King knew. MMY's answer was that he was > a monk, which implied that he didn't have children for that reason. So now Dr. Smear, the king of rumour, Rick Archer claim that Maharishi has fathered a child. I'm not claiming anything of the sort. All I'm saying this that his answer to Larry King's question about whether he had any children was that he didn't because he was/is a monk. We're discussing the point because you claimed that he didn't claim to be a monk, despite that fact that throughout his life, he did often claim to be one.
