Rick Archer" rick@ wrote: > > OK. I think I get what you're saying. You're just saying > > that he chose his words carefully so he wouldn't be guilty > > of out-and-out lying, while still conveying the impression > > that he was celibate. > >Judy: Yes! Sheesh!
This strikes me as very unlikely, even preposterous. So Mahrishi, at least during his period of sexual activity was careful not to implicate himself as a "celibate" so that he could say he never claimed to be celibate should the subject come up, or that he could have some degree of plausible denialability.? Wowzer. I am giving this a 1% liklihood. But if you want to hang your hat on a 1% possibility, be my guest.
