No, of course not. Again, not the point. But it's these kind of statements and actions (putting the congressman in gun cross-hairs) that creates an atmosphere where the unhinged feel they have the OK to go ahead. Whether or not that's what motivated this particular guy is too early to tell.
Let's not forget: this Congresswoman's headquarters was the subject of a gun fire attack during the campaign. And what's with starting out a sentence with "So.." and following it up with an absurd statement "you're suggesting that Palin planned the assassination..." Don't go getting all Willy on us. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" <geezerfreak@> wrote: > > > > You completely missed the point. > > > > Plus, I guess you missed Gifford being in gun crosshair > > sites on Palin's own site. Must have been a weird coincidence > > that Palin took that down immediately after the incident eh? > > So now you're suggesting Palin helped plan the assassination > attempt and took down the graphic because she didn't want > anybody to connect her with it? > > Or maybe she took it down because the attempt wasn't successful? > > Joe... >
