Was this in response to my remarks or the others that you quoted? Either way, sounds like somebody struck a nerve... Lawson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" <emptybill@...> wrote: > > > This is quite funny. Where did you learn to be so funny? MIU? You sound > like a parrot for those silly rajas. Did they give you these talking > points? > > You might want to check your sources since your point shows unawareness > of MMY's transmission of mantra. This also includes the actual > experience of "entertaining in attention" the mantra-s that MMY > gave to initiators. > > Clarify your meaning if you dispute this. > > Oh � and stop telling people what to do. Rather, take your bullshit > superstitions to your ishta-devataa � that is if you have one and if > you know how to do so. > *********************************** > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > > You have still missed my point: "your" mantra is the one you remember > in your head and use during TM. Mantras that you teach are the ones that > you were given on a piece of paper. If you insist on saying "that is my > mantra, on that piece of paper," then you have frozen your mantra to be > the same as what is on the piece of paper. It may or may not be the > "same," but there is no longer as great an opportunity for it to change > (or not change) since you have frozen it to the paper. Your innocence > has been lessened. Its inevitable for TM teachers to have that problem, > but given that you are insisting that the mantra on paper is the "same" > one as in your head, it seems to me that your innocence has been > lessened more than usual, which could help explain why you (and so many > others on this forum) are more interested in knocking TM than in > practicing it. > > > > This makes sense to me at least, since you no feel that you were fed a > bill of goods, and you're angry about being taken in by it so you must > detract from what you were originally taught at every possibility. > > > > Lawson > > >
