--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > The question is, are these insights you couldn't have > > found from non-channeled sources? Descriptions of changing > > patterns in the course of spiritual development are, > > forgive me, a dime a dozen, as are feminine perspectives > > on spirituality. > > > > I'm not suggesting they're not good and valuable insights, > > just that, at least as you describe them, they don't sound, > > again, like "higher knowledge" that could be received only > > from a source not accessible via normal means. > > > You are right on all counts. They worked for me then. And > I really haven't revisted them. It didn't and doesn't matter > to me where they came from. I found them valuable at that > time. These writers, or channelers claim they came from off > planet sources. Great. Bully for them.
And more power to you. Insight's where you find it. The only way it might matter, it seems to me, would be if one gave special weight to "channeled" insights because of the purported source (which you're not doing), rather than evaluating them as one would an "earthly" source.
