"*When I say "resonated" I am saying that among the Hindu pantheon of deities it also the feminine I have had the greatest affinity for, as in "Durga". I don't think she would not fit anyone's description of "dainty" (-:"
Durga kicks ass! Very cool - yeah, I have been finding it fascinating for awhile that within the Hindu pantheon we discover a live resonance with one diety over the other. Personally I have found that this affinity changes over time, apparently by itself, becoming more inclusive. Unmistakable - my bodymind, the radio station - lol. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" steve.sundur@ > wrote: > > <snip> > > > Just curious. Do you find all "channeled" "knowledge" as bunk? > > > Just asking. I don't have an ulterior motive. I have on > > > occassion gotten value from this venue (reading books) in the > > > past, but haven't gone that route (or any route for that matter) > > > in some time. But I have found some of it insightful. > > > > Depends on whether you mean "bunk" in the sense of the > > content or in the sense of the purported source. As far as > > the purported source is concerned, if the content really > > comes from Ascended Masters or some other source that has > > "higher knowledge," you'd expect the insights to be novel, > > not anything already available from earthly sources. From > > everything I've read, "channeled" knowledge, insightful > > though it may be, is just recycled from scriptures and > > other existing sources. > > > I'd have to reach back in my memory banks. There was a period when I > gained great benefit from some books by Barbara Hand Clow and Barbara > Marciniak, supposedly inspired or channeled from Pleidian sources. In > some cases specific insights and technologies were discussed (although > unverifiable as far as I could see). A couple of examples may be: > development of a 12 strand DNA to be able to move into a higher > dimension of functioning. Children being born after 1996 having a DNA > code which makes them more resistant to pesticides. A technology for > evesdropping which is dependant on mental abilities and not technology. > Also, supposedly tapping into akashic records to clarify some of the > early beginnings of earth. > > I mention these so that people who want to lampoon me can have some > ammo. But the real value I got was in discussing some of the changing > patterns one goes through as they become a more spiritual being. And > because it was supposedly "Pleidian" in its' source it was told from a > feminine perspective which resonated with me.* That's best as I can > describe it right now. > > *When I say "resonated" I am saying that among the Hindu pantheon of > deities it also the feminine I have had the greatest affinity for, as > in "Durga". I don't thing she would not fit anyone's description of > "dainty" (-: >
