> My "experiment" was to see how long > > it would take them to prove my descriptions > > prescient, and accurate. So far it's only > > taken five hours to produce seven "proof" > > posts... > > authfriend: > Nonono, wrong. Those seven posts were "proof" only > that you haven't stopped attacking yet, as is this > one... > Give Barry some slack, can't you see that he is having problems? Obviously he is blind to reason at this point; burned out totally, apparently. He doesn't even understand what he is doing.
You really waxed him good this time! Good work. "In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response..." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet) > Nor have you stopped being dishonest; you're > going to be criticized for dishonesty no matter what > you're talking about. > > Remember that the biggest complaint against you is > about *you* as a particular individual, not about > your criticisms of TM or anything else. > > Naturally, you resist acknowledging this. But you > analyzed the dynamic very well not long ago: > > "This is the 'They aren't really criticizing me, > they are criticizing my beliefs...what they > really hate is what I believe in' argument > that True Believers trot out over and over. > Please note that this is a typical and well- > documented cult tactic used to make a criticism > of a *particular individual* seem as if it's > 'really' a criticism of the group the cultist > is attempting to appeal to and gain sympathy > from." > > You were demonizing "True Believers," but in fact > it applies to you more than it does to them. Even > if you never made another post about TM/the TMO/MMY/ > TMers and instead posted on other topics, but used > the same "style" and obnoxious tactics, you'd still > come in for criticism, which would demonstrate that > the criticism is about *you personally*, not your > TM-related beliefs. > > And I'll make the point once again that if you don't > read the posts of the people you're targeting, you > are obviously not in a position to claim they lack > creativity or have nothing else to say. >