Oh, one other thing, and I don't know if you can comprehend this Bob, but the burden of proof is on you, not me. You are the one making an accusation, not me. So, perhaps you don't realize that you are doing what you seem to rail against so often-trying to make the person asking for substantiation the one who has the deficiency. Why don't you try "walking the talk" for change instead of just "talking the talk".
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert" babajii_99@ wrote: > > I'm not sure if she would want her name posted here... > > I'll have to ask her before I would do that... > > The point is, that she told me the inner workings of how things went > iin the movement and how it became more of a money making maching, and > how Maharishi became obssessed with money... > > And if I posted her name, you would come up with another objection to > tehtruth, because you're not interested in the truth... > > > Bob, you are just too predictable. Her story may or may not be true. > For all I know it is. But what a weak basis on which to make an > acccusation. And of course you are following the script. Throw out an > accusation and then disavow all knowledge or hide under the cover of > "national security" type thing. >
