Pile on? Vaj has simply been exposed as a liar. Not sure what standard you look for in evaluating statements. But Vaj made a series of assertions and all of them turned out to be false. When asked to back up these assertions, the best he could come up with, was "he heard it from someone"
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@...> wrote: > > A pile-on just wouldn't be the same without > a drive-by from feste. > > Sal > > On May 25, 2011, at 2:42 PM, feste37 wrote: > > Vaj reminds me of the wacko political right who will say anything to put their Democratic enemies in a bad light. For example, the claims in the 1990s that Bill Clinton was involved in drug-running and that Vince Foster, the Clinton aide, was murdered. Same thing against Obama. They will say anything at all. Evidence? No need to bother with it. Just get the smear out there and watch it do its work. This kind of stuff says more about the accusers than it does about the accused. You can no more have a rational conversation with Vaj about MMY than you can with Rush Limbaugh and his ilk about Obama. > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "richardnelson108" richardnelson108@ wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On May 25, 2011, at 1:20 PM, richardnelson108 wrote: > >> > >>> And yet you assume you know that Maharishi "stole" the formulas > >> > >> I heard it directly from one of Balraj's students. > >> > >> I guess one of the problems with the open, innocent hearts of healers > >> like Balraj is that mountebanks like Mahesh love to use them and toss > >> them away, like used toys. > >> > >>> > >>> The same way you "know" that Maharishi poisoned Guru Dev, which I > >>> have already pointed out previously is a lie. > >> > >> Actually I said he was a leading suspect. > >> > >> It really speaks more to his character; how people saw him. I mean if > >> he was the sattvic, white silk-clad, benevolent saint some might > >> imagine, would he have ever been a suspect at all? > >> > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Again I ask... why do you have so much hate in your heart that you > >>> have to try to hurt MMY's reputation any way you can. > >>> > >>> I have no problem if you have an opinion about who MMY was and what > >>> he has done. But why must you constantly make your opinion into > >>> supposed "facts"? > >>> > >>> So one more time... Whats wrong with you? > >> > >> Being born with a conscience has it drawbacks. > >> > > Oh Yeah, that's right.. you have such a conscience! You lie, make shit up and have the nerve to say you have a conscience! > > > > And again for the record. MMY was NEVER a prime suspect in the supposed poisoning of Guru Dev. As I previously pointed out, I have been in Allahabad many times and interviewed the judge who handled Guru Dev';s will and many others associated with Shankaracharya ashram. None of them knew anything about this supposed poisoning, so how could MMY have been a prime suspect? You haven';t been there but speak as if you have been STOP MAKING SHIT UP!! > > Have you opinion, fine. But again I am wondering, why you must lie to prove that your point of view is the correct one? > > You must have been really hurt by someone as a child. > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ >
