Well if yet more unverifiable claims~~ie opinions~~ are what constitutes "a very strong case" in *your* opinion, feste...I sure hope I never have you on my side of the defense table, so to speak. Sal
On May 26, 2011, at 7:50 AM, feste37 wrote: Have you even read the posts by Richard you quote here? He presents a very strong case against all the accusations made by Vaj. Read it. All you do is try to smear him as "unstable," which is plainly not the case. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@...> wrote: > > Here are Richard's "facts," Jim, or at least > all the ones I've seen lately~~perhaps you could post > the ones I've missed: > > "Hi, Richard here. Since this was originally written to me, I thought I > would chime in. > I will take responsibility for adding my negative comments about Vaj where > they were not necessary. After all, the post was about Jerry Jarvis and not > a response to Vaj. So therefore, as I said earlier, it may have been > inappropriate > I was confused and angry about the fact that no one here seemed to challenge > Vaj on his "facts" for so long, that I felt compelled to say something and > may have over reacted. > But, be clear... I am not a movement true believer and did not make my > comments to defend Maharishi or the movement. I just wanted the facts to be > brought out and let the chips fall where they may." > > "Vaj, > You ignorant slut, > > What is wrong with you? And why do make this shit up? Its complete lies. > > Don't you know that Dr. Raju was MMY's personal physician for years and has > been the head physician at a Maharishi ayurveda hospital in Delhi for many > years? If your story had any truth in it, Dr. Raju would not be working at a > Maharishi Ayurveda facility which uses the "stolen" formulas. He would have > nothing to do with the TM movement or its branches because he would feel that > MMY was a thief. But yet, there he is. > Have you ever met Dr. Raju? Been to his hospital? Of course you haven't. > Because if you had, you would know that as soon as you walk in the door, > there is a huge picture of MMY and in Dr. Raju's office, same thing. If Dr. > Raju thought MMY was a thief I don't think he would be sitting there with > MMY's picture and greeting you with "Jai Guru Dev". > > As usual, you just make these things up, and quote them as if they are facts. > Then when confronted on your statements, you run away like a little girl and > never respond when criticized. > > Vaj, you are a liar and have serious issues. Why do you have so much hate > inside you?" > > "Vaj, > You coward! As usual, no response when someone points out your lies! > You love to pontificate your supposed "knowledge", but you just make it up. > Come on, lets debate or discuss the facts. Don't just run away like the > coward you are. > > You know nothing of Balaraj or Raju's relationship with Maharishi. > And yet you assume you know that Maharishi "stole" the formulas > > The same way you "know" that Maharishi poisoned Guru Dev, which I have > already pointed out previously is a lie. > > Again I ask... why do you have so much hate in your heart that you have to > try to hurt MMY's reputation any way you can. > > I have no problem if you have an opinion about who MMY was and what he has > done. But why must you constantly make your opinion into supposed "facts"? > > So one more time... Whats wrong with you? " > > "Oh Yeah, that's right.. you have such a conscience! You lie, make shit up > and have the nerve to say you have a conscience! > > And again for the record. MMY was NEVER a prime suspect in the supposed > poisoning of Guru Dev. As I previously pointed out, I have been in Allahabad > many times and interviewed the judge who handled Guru Dev';s will and many > others associated with Shankaracharya ashram. None of them knew anything > about this supposed poisoning, so how could MMY have been a prime suspect? > You haven';t been there but speak as if you have been STOP MAKING SHIT UP!! > Have you opinion, fine. But again I am wondering, why you must lie to prove > that your point of view is the correct one? > You must have been really hurt by someone as a child." > > I mean, with evidence and clear thinking like that, it's no wonder > Vaj has no response! All this because Vaj wrote a few dozen > words expressing his opinion on something MMY supposedly > did~~stole medicines or formulas or whatever from > Balraj M. That's called "opinion" guys, no matter > how someone might express it. Jim and lurk, you feste and > the others in the anti-Vaj camp definitely need a new spokesperson. > Or not, your choice. But egging on someone like Richard > who is clearly unstable isn't nice. > > Sal > > On May 26, 2011, at 6:29 AM, whynotnow7 wrote: > > Comparing the facts of richardnelson108, based on actual events he witnessed > with Vaj's imaginings, and you call them equivalent? You recently said I had > the intellectual depth of a turnip. I'm sorry but I cannot even grant you > that much mental capacity. Your shriveled heart and blinding ego have created > in you a spiritual moron.
