I agree. Exercising his body would do him a lot more good than running his mind 
in vicious little circles.:-)

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@> wrote:
> >
> > Whew - a very active imagination you have Bozotronic Barry! Typical for 
> > someone who enjoys blaming everyone but themselves for their lack of 
> > spiritual progress. I just posted recently the reason for my reaction of 
> > shock and anger when I first stated on FFL that I had attained self 
> > realization about five years ago. Here it is again. Perhaps you could 
> > remember it this time?
> > 
> > When I first popped into CC (not knowing what the SOC was, but knowing that 
> > I felt an overwhelming relief at this unprecedented sense of inner 
> > freedom), I thought it would be helpful to report that ordinary joes like 
> > me could attain the ultimate goal of spiritual seeking. It was precisely 
> > because I do not consider myself special that I thought this was a useful 
> > thing for others to know, that enlightenment was not some rare thing just 
> > for esoteric monks but that regular householder types not affiliated with 
> > the TM organization or any other, could also attain it.
> > 
> > Unlike you, who have made your spiritual dabblings the core of your social 
> > identity, I had gone about my seeking largely alone. So I was dismayed, 
> > shocked and angered when others immediately called my SOC into question. I 
> > also see in retrospect that what I was experiencing was the classic 
> > hallmark of CC as defined by Maharishi, inner freedom and infinite 
> > expansion on the inside, yet a foreign world on the outside.
> > 
> > The challenging turned out to be a good thing for me, as it highlighted my 
> > lack of integration between my inner state and the outer world. This in 
> > turn challenged me to go through a series of integrations similar to some 
> > of the 'dark night of the wills' experiences Adyashanti describes in the 
> > dark night of the soul talk that Rick recently posted.
> > 
> > So at this point I am unruffled by what anyone wants to say about my SOC. 
> > Although my detailed and extensive reading of both MMY's BG (numerous 
> > times) and SBAL (once) books are obviously not a requirement for any SOC, I 
> > found them to be helpful in providing signposts and faith at the time.
> > 
> > Its really pretty useless for you to try and distract yourself over me, 
> > Bozotronic Barry. if you want to do some good, please focus on yourself a 
> > little more, perhaps listen to Adyashanti's talk, take your quest a little 
> > more seriously, and stop appearing as everyone's idea of a spiritual joke. 
> > Of course the choice is always yours, and with that I bid you Adieu.:-)
> 
> 
> What our selfproclaimed bully and believer in useless theories propaganted by 
> the Dolly Lama, the Turqo should do, in my honest opinion, is taking his dogs 
> out for more frequent walks !
>


Reply via email to